A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, specially inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which is partly developed, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their view, an allegation that's been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and ailments hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is determined by worry for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting as a substitute that it is about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely wanting to establish a household dwelling in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Special Space of Conservation and say that all functions are completed dependant on Experienced guidance and accredited plans. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering The ocean through a storm, usually do not change the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.